Melihat sahaja tajuk di atas pasti ramai yang merasa seram dan tertanya-tanya kenapa kumpulan k-pop terkenal, VIXX ingin membalas dendam, serta pada siapa patung voodoo itu ingin dituju? Adakah pada musuh mereka yang berada dalam industri […]
Melihat sahaja tajuk di atas pasti ramai yang merasa seram dan tertanya-tanya kenapa kumpulan k-pop terkenal, VIXX ingin membalas dendam, serta pada siapa patung voodoo itu ingin dituju? Adakah pada musuh mereka yang berada dalam industri […]
Pemuda PKR (AMK) menyelar kenyataan Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia (ISMA) yang mengaitkan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dengan fahaman “liberal demokratik”, yang menurut NGO itu akan membawa Malaysia ke arah negara tiada agama.
Timbalan ketua penerangannya Najwan Halimi berkata, kenyataan Presiden ISMA Abdullah Zaik Abdul Rahman itu berniat jahat, terkepung dalam ideologi tajaan PERKASA dan sekadar mengulangi pandangan perkauman yang jumud.
Malah, menurut Najwan, ia boleh mencetuskan sentimen agama dan perpecahan kaum.
“Apa yang jelas adalah, Abdullah Zaik sendiri tidak memahami kerangka liberal dalam konteks yang menyeluruh,” kata Najwan.
Dalam kenyataannya hari ini, Najwan juga berhujah, kritikan Abdullah Zaik terhadap Buku Jingga dinyatakan tanpa menyebut komitmen bersama Pakatan Rakyat untuk mempertahankan perlembagaan, Islam sebagai agama rasmi dan melindungi keistimewaan Melayu.
Berhubung dakwaan Institut Kajian Dasar (IKD) pimpinan pimpinan pusat PKR Khalid Jaafar, mempromosikan fahaman liberal secara terancang, Najwan menafikannya.
“IKD sebagai sebuah institusi pemikir bukan sekadar mengangkat wacana liberal sebagai tema perdebatan bahkan turut mempromosi aliran pemikiran Islam klasik dan kontemporari sejajar dengan pergulatan pelbagai isu dan krisis pemikiran, sosial dan budaya di negara ini,” katanya.
On the 150th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s greatest speech, equality and democracy are still under attack
The Gettysburg Address contains two simple truths. One is to be found in its first sentence, one in its last.
The first is that “all men are created equal”. The second lies in Abraham Lincoln’s determination that “… government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” A century and a half after they were spoken, the force of those 21 words is undiminished.
This is not to say the rest of the Address no longer holds meaning. We should remember those who fought and died in the American Civil War. All Lincoln’s words are wonderful to read and written in a way that is easy for people to understand. His speeches have a poetic simplicity.
But today, when we read the Gettysburg Address, we should first be reminded that in the US – as around the world – the simple truths it expresses are under sustained assault.
Food-stamp cuts. Public-service cuts. Attacks on voting rights in a democratic system completely at the mercy of money. The death penalty, the awful symbol of a criminal justice system weighted against the poor. Tax inequality. Taxpayers’ money used to shore up Wall Street. Opposition to healthcare for all. Opposition to immigration reform. Government surveillance.
No one needs a history degree to know the fight for equality and popular democracy did not end, with the American Civil War, in 1865.
Lincoln led a war effort which resulted in the abolition of slavery. We should never forget this – particularly when powerful reminders are available. Mark the 150th anniversary of Lincoln’s speech with a viewing of 12 Years a Slave and you will be reminded, with a succession of terrible jolts, that in the Gettysburg Address, Lincoln simply stated the truth.
The writer of that film, Tony Ridley, is American. But like me the director, Steve McQueen, is British. So is his star, Chiwetel Ejiofor. The female lead, Lupita Nyong’o, is Kenyan. The Gettysburg Address is a foundation stone of American history, but like the Declaration of Independence (which it cites), it also resonates around the world. Lincoln’s words speak clearly to those of us who are from countries, however benignly governed, in which all men are not deemed to be equal. It speaks more urgently to those still living under slavery, or theocracy, or dictatorship.
We are all equal – regardless of birth, colour, religious belief or the lack of it, sex or sexual orientation. We are all equal regardless of wealth. We have made strides in recognising that equality, but in the century and a half since slavery fell we have not come close to perfecting it. Our governments should at least attempt to do so.
Today, then, we might ask: called upon to read Lincoln’s words, could any of our leaders possibly do them justice?
We have a chance to find out. For PBS, the documentarian Ken Burns has filmed public figures reading the Gettysburg Address. The list includes every living president, as well as congressmen, mayors, historians, journalists and Whoopi Goldberg. Stephen Colbert’s performance is meant to be funny. Marco Rubio’s, less so. Tea Party favourite Ted Cruz, alas, hasn’t yet answered the call.
The spectrum of opinion represented – from Bill O’Reilly to Rachel Maddow – demonstrates the chaotic nature of any democracy. But if we can agree, as the participants in Burns’ project presumably do, that the Gettysburg Address expresses the fundamental truths on which America was founded, we should at least be honest with ourselves about how those truths relate to America and the world today. Lincoln’s words should not simply be celebrated, without questioning what he meant by them. We should also ask what his words mean to us.
Whether genuine equality under genuine government of, by and for the people could ever exist is, of course, debatable. What is not in question today is that 150 years ago, Abraham Lincoln made the most powerful statement that it should.
Siapa disini setuju bahawa produksi tempatan kekurangan filem genre hantu yang benar-benar seram di pawagam? Kami sendiri mengalami kesukaran untuk menyenaraikan top 5 filem hantu paling seram di Malaysia. Namun, selepas melakukan sedikit perbincangan, krew […]
Dalam diam rupanya banyak aktiviti dan persediaan yang dilakukan oleh Nana Mahazan sebelum menyambut kelahiran cahaya mata kedua. Beberapa minggu lepas, Nana ada berkongsi gambar keluarga bahagianya yang diambil sewaktu sesi penggambaran foto khas untuk […]
Kami pasti anda sekarang sedang tergelak besar pabila membaca tajuk diatas, kan? Bukan sekadar tajuk gimik, tapi inilah yang berlaku dalam sebuah rancangan televisyen Between The Fern yang dihoskan oleh Zach Galifianakis. Bagi anda yang […]
Pernah tak anda terfikir berapa agaknya bayaran yang diterima oleh selebriti setiap kali mereka membuat persembahan, berlakon atau sekadar menghadiri majlis jemputan? Mungkin ada antara anda yang berpendapat golongan selebriti senang buat duit berdasarkan populariti […]
Pt.1: Hello Paris! Hello Helsinki!
Pt.2: First meeting with Ms.Helsinki
Pt.3: CityCenter & Stockmann in Helsinki
Pt.4: Streets In Helsinki
Pt.5: Nokia Store, Cafe In The Park & Exploring Helsinki
Pt.6: First Dinner In Finland!
Pt.7: Visit to Nokia House in Helsinki, Finland
Pt.8: The bridge, the room & the wall of Nokia phones
Pt.9: Top view, bottom view and rooftop garden at Nokia House, Finland
After touring the Nokia House, it was finally lunch time.
We gathered in a meeting room and waited for one of the managers to join us.
We had time so we posed a bit.
Lunch was at the cafe in Nokia House itself.
We then went out of to the outdoor area for ice cream!
The view above us.
We took a groupie!
Why were we in Finland? To announce us as the Nokia MVC Judges.dtsv.dtse_post_7015_permalink = 'http://www.smashpop.net/we-are-the-judges'; dtsv.dtse_post_7015_title = 'We Are The Judges!';
Sebelum ini Lana Nordin pernah menghangatkan industri hiburan tempatan apabila memperkenalkan teman lelakinya warga Republik Czech kepada khalayak ramai. Ramai yang terkejut apabila pelakon yang mendapat jolokan Pamela Anderson Malaysia itu mengakui bercinta dengan lelaki […]
Hujung minggu lalu, telah berlangsungnya majlis akikah buat puteri bongsu bekas penyampai radio Hot FM, Faizal Ismail dan isteri tercinta, Norazlina Ahmad. Artikel Berkaitan : Isteri Faizal Ismail Selamat Lahirkan Bayi Perempuan Majlis yang bertemakan rona […]
Much as we would like to generate more income every month, sometimes, it is more difficult than it sounds.
For most wage-earners, who need to be at your desk or working for your employers for the better part of the day (and often stay back late or take work home), there really is little opportunity to create additional revenue streams. So, in the absence of being able to generate more income, how can you increase the amount that you can save, from your existing paycheck?
The answer is, spend less! This may sound like a no-brainer, but you’d be surprised how many people have not really grasped the concept that the only way to retain a greater part of what you earn, is to cut down on your spending.
Check out these 10 rules for smart budgeting.
Again, another no-brainer…but yet again, many people just can’t get round to doing one.
Before we go any further, let me stop and re-emphasize this point – having a budget is an absolute necessity.
If you do not know how much you have spent for the month and how much you will spend for the month, you are almost guaranteed to run out of cash way before the end of the month.
The catchphrase here, should be “Do whatever works”. For those financially savvy guys out there, you’ll be able to create detailed and complex spreadsheets or use a personal finance software programme for this purpose. But one does not need a fancy software programme or app to do a budget. Actually, a simple paper exercise book will do if need be… as the saying goes, where there’s a will, there’s a way !
Yes…every expense. It may sound really tedious and time consuming, but in reality, once you create a system that works for you, tracking your expenses is not difficult. Just note down what you spend every day immediately after you spend it. There is a lot of “down time” spent waiting for the lift, waiting in a traffic jam, waiting in line, etc. Use some of this time to update your records.
Much has been written about the insidious “latte factor”. Basically the idea is that people spend on stuff they don’t really need, which end up costing them quite a lot at the end of the month.
By the same token, if you cut out or reduce daily spending on expensive “nice-to-have” items, you’ll end up saving more at the end of the month.
This is a must-do. No two ways about it. The only strategy to improve overall financial health is to work hard at building it up. And to do this, you need to set aside time to review your income, expenses, savings and investment portfolios and plans regularly. You and you alone, must take the responsibility.
The latest smartphone, the latest luxury car, the newest collection of high-fashion wear, the latest designer sunglasses…there’s just no escaping the invitation to spend, spend, spend. Have a coping strategy in place. Either delay the purchase, or keep little cash in your wallet and no credit card.
From your monthly take-home pay (after deducting EPF and income tax contributions), work out how much you must save from that amount. Then transfer that amount to a separate account as soon as your paycheck comes in. Pay yourself, before you deal with the bills. Adjust your non-essential expenditure if need be. And make it hard for yourself to withdraw money from that account… lock up the chequebook/ATM card.
There is of course a tendency to spend “a bit more this month” because you have received a bonus, news of an increment or some other “windfall”. While you should of course treat yourself or your loved ones to something special, don’t increase your spending just because of the windfall. Be disciplined and keep to your normal budget. The excess money should go into your separate account.
Even after that increment or after starting a new job with a better salary, don’t start spending on luxuries you don’t need just because you are earning more. If you look around you will see that many extremely wealthy individuals do not drive fancy cars or dress in designer clothing. They live below their means and continue to spend less than they earn. Often, this is one of the key drivers behind their massive wealth.
The need for discipline and constant monitoring may sound like a sad way to live, but think about it – most of our worries are related one way or the other, to our finances. If we put in the extra effort to put our financial house in order, our state of mind will improve. We will be able to reap the rewards by not only having more money for our own needs but also, being able to give more to charitable and worthy causes.
As the wise Benjamin Franklin once said, “A penny saved, is a penny earned”. Hopefully, the above rules will be useful to you in spending smarter and will help you save not just pennies, but dollars as well.
What other rules do you impose to yourself? Tell us in the comment section below.
A board of inquiry is set up if ever there is a loss of government assets of a certain stipulated value, says former Kuala Lumpur CID chief, Mat Zain Ibrahim.
Referring to de facto Law Minister Nancy Shukri’s statement to Parliament yesterday on the Pulau Batu Puteh issue, Mat Zain said in that case, the country lost to Singapore sovereignty over an island that was rightfully Malaysia’s.
“Yet the government feels an inquiry is not necessary. Don’t the citizens have the right to know what caused our defeat? Don’t we have the right to know whether our failure was due to negligence, incompetence or corruption, which we may have been famous for?” he asked.
Describing Nancy’s reply yesterday as far from satisfactory, Mat Zain believes it would be a big mistake if the government believed the issue would die off by giving such an answer.
The minister, he felt, may not have sighted his statutory declaration that he sent to Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak, Chief Secretary to the government Ali Hamsa, and Solicitor-General Idrus Harun.
Nancy in reply to a question in Parliament said Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail had nothing to do with the fake evidence in the form of a photograph tendered to the International Court of Justice in the hearing of the Pulau Batu Puteh dispute with Singapore.
However, Mat Zain noted, Nancy did not deny that the controversial photograph was tendered in as evidence the course of the ICJ proceedings and that it was deliberated on by the panel of judges and entered in the notes of proceedings. .
“One thing is for certain: the concocted photograph did not fly to The Hague or sneak itself into the proceedings four days before the oral presentations without any of the Malaysian delegates knowing.”
“There must be someone who introduced the photograph. Senior members of the Malaysian delegation, including Gani (right), must have given the clearance or approval for the controversial photograph to be presented to the panel.”
Mat Zain said the team must have known, or have been fully aware, that the photograph would not stand the scrutiny and someone should bear the blame for bringing disrepute to the country in the international arena before the ICJ.
“That is the purpose for calling for a royal commission of inquiry into the Pulau Batu Puteh matter,” he said, adding that the rakyat have the right to know what had happened after the ICJ proceedings.
The state of the media in Malaysia indicates that the nation is not as democratic as it is made out to be, said a university-based researcher.
This is because most of the “mainstream Malaysian news media… is actually more akin to a BN party organ”, Nottingham University Media and Communications associate professor Tessa Houghton said.
“When the only media functioning as anything like professional news journalism organisations are in Mandarin or are online, it’s safe to say that something is seriously rotten in what aspires to be the best democracy in the world,” she said.
Houghton was responding to arguments against her media monitoring findings conducted in the lead-up to and during the 13th general election.
In particular, she was responding to crticism that she had chosen not to monitor party organs such as PAS mouthpiece Harakah and PKR organ Suara Keadilan.
In her article posted on Sunday in the Australian National University portal, the New Mandala, Houghton said: “Party organs and news media perform different roles, and the former cannot substitute for the latter.
“News media should facilitate informed political participation and hopefully, understanding of (if not agreement with) our socio-political community; party organs are for the express purpose of party advocacy, and are intended to ‘preach to the choir’.”
Houghton, who teaches at Nottingham University’s Malaysian campus in Semenyih, also countered those who argued that the bias in print media was balanced by social media.
She argued that about 35 percent of Malaysians – mainly older, poorer and more rural groups – do not have access to the Internet and that this is reflective of the voting trends.
“These populations have and continue to consume primarily BN propaganda masquerading as news, whereas wealthier, younger, urban populations are constantly bombarded with and socialised into consuming a multitude of competing and critical perspectives,” she said.
As for social media, Houghton warned that continued reliance on social-media mediated political debate would lead to “cyberbalkanisation” – further polarisation based on political support.
“The media are key to the democratic and electoral integrity of any political system …
“Malaysian citizens who relied on English and Bahasa Malaysia newspapers and/or television as their media source during the GE13 campaign … were not provided with fair and accurate information with which to construct informed voting preferences.”
Presented earlier this year, Houghton’s research, done in collaboration with the Centre for Independent Journalism, found that news portals Malaysiakini and The Malaysian Insider and the Chinese press were more balanced in their election coverage. On the flip side, national news agency Bernama was found to be biased in favour of the BN, as were English and Bahasa Malaysia newspapers and television channels.
Ahad lepas, Justin Bieber baru sahaja melancarkan single terbarunya bersama R. Kelly menerusi lagu mereka berjudul Put You Down atau singkatannya PYD. Bercakap menerusi sebuah laporan media tempatan, R. Kelly telah melahirkan rasa teruja kerana dapat […]
Berita mengenai bintang Disney, Selena Gomez yang akan turun ke Malaysia pada tahun hadapan baru sahaja diumumkan beberapa jam yang lepas. Namun begitu, para peminat di negara ini nampaknya sudah tidak sabar untuk melihat penyanyi […]
Pada bulan September yang lepas, kumpulan Pop Rock dari Korea Selatan, FT Island telah melancarkan mini album istimewa berjudul Thanks To bersempena dengan ulangtahun FT Island yang keenam. Dan nampaknya, FT Island benar-benar menghargai sokongan […]
Sebut sahaja nama Julia Perez atau Jupe, pasti ramai yang mengaitkan pelakon itu dengan gelaran artis paling seksi dan kontroversi di Indonesia kan? Namun begitu sewaktu bercuti bersama keluarganya Jumaat lepas, Jupe dilihat telah mengurangkan […]
Sudah menjadi perkara biasa, setiap kali tiba hujung tahun, berderet-deret majlis kahwin yang akan diadakan. Tak kurang juga pada para artis yang memilih musim cuti sebagai hari untuk melangsungkan majlis perkahwinan. Terbaru, menerusi Media Hiburan […]
Press Statement By DAP Secretary-General And MP For Bagan Lim Guan Eng In Kuala Lumpur On 19.11.2013.
Malaysia’s failure to protect Malaysians, ensure security and stop illegal Filipinbo immigrants from freely entering Sabah to threaten Malaysians highlighted only when a foreign tourist is killed and another kidnapped. Taiwanese media and TV stations have painted a negative picture of Malaysia as a failed state by reporting on alleged lax security, slow police response and bad PR in handling the incident that involved two Taiwanese victims.
There is a lack of persistence and absence of disciplined focus on fundamentals of maintaining security. Malaysian police had said that a resort guard ran to inform the General Operations Force (GOF) base about 800m away. Taiwanese television reported that when a guard who heard the gunshots during the incident tried to contact police, eight of the officers on the island did not respond to him.
This fundamental failure and the fact that the incident happened about less than 1km from one of the bases of the Eastern Sabah Security Command (Esscom), which was set up after the Feb 12 Sulu intrusion in Lahad Datu, is the clearest proof that Esscom has failed to carry out its fundamental duty. The Filipino terrorists have also shown that they do not fear the Malaysian security forces.
That such criminal acts can happen so near to the ESSCOM bases has shattered the illusion of public safety. In other words, this security breakdown have shown that there are no safe areas from attacks by such Filipino terrorists.
Defence Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein’s feeble attempt to deflect Taiwanese anger and avoid blame by remarking that this incident could happen anywhere is both insensitive and irresponsible as well as cold comfort to either the victims or their families. No amount of damage control by the BN government can hide the fact that the security in ESSCOM areas have failed.
The challenge is what corrective action can be taken to put the fear of God into these criminals terrorising Malaysians in these areas and ensure that there will be no repeat of such barbaric acts against innocent Malaysians and tourists. Unfortunately the authorities have neither said nor done anything that has given confidence that the terrorists will be punished and the victims rescued or that there will be no repeat of similar security breakdowns.
If the Malaysian government cannot provide and ensure security, perhaps they should seek assistance from international bodies such as the United Nations. I am certain that the United Nations will reciprocate such requests for help since Malaysia has contributed much to the United Nations Peacekeeping forces throughout the world.
LIM GUAN ENG
Kenyataan Media oleh Setiausaha Agung DAP merangkap Ahli Parlimen Bagan, Lim Guan Eng di Kuala Lumpur pada 19 November 2013.
Kegagalan kerajaan Malaysia untuk menjaga dan memastikan keselamatan rakyat Malaysia, dan menghalang kemasukan haram pendatang tanpa izin Filipina memasuki Sabah dan mengancam warganegara hanya kelihatan jelas apabila seorang pelancong asing terbunuh dan seorang lagi diculik.
Kegagalan kerajaan Malaysia untuk menjaga dan memastikan keselamatan rakyat Malaysia, dan menghalang kemasukan haram pendatang tanpa izin Filipina memasuki Sabah dan mengancam warganegara hanya kelihatan jelas apabila seorang pelancong asing terbunuh dan seorang lagi diculik. Media dan stesen televisyen Taiwan memaparkan imej buruk bagi Malaysia sebagai sebuah negara yang gagal apabila ia melaporkan soal kelalaian keselamatan, tindak balas polis yang lembap dan perhubungan awam yang buruk dalam menangani insiden yang melibatkan dua mangsa warga Taiwan.
Wujud kekurangan dari segi kesungguhan dan disiplin dalam memberi fokus terhadap asas-asas dalam menjaga keselematan. Pihak Polis Di Raja Malaysia telah menyebut bahawa seorang pengawal resort telah berlari untuk memaklumkan pusat operasi Pasukan Gerakan Am yang terletak 800m dari tempatnya. Televisyen Taiwan pula melaporkan apabila pengawal tersebut mendengar bunyi tembakan sewaktu insiden tersebut dan cuba berhubung dengan pihak polis, lapan pegawai di pulau tersebut tidak pun memberi respon kepadanya.
Kegagalan fundamental sebegini dan hakikat bahawa insiden tersebut mengambil tempat kurang daripada 1km daripada salah satu pengkalan Eastern Sabah Security Command (Esscom), yang diwujudkan selepas pencerobohan Sulu di Lahad Datu pada 12 Februari; adalah bukti jelas bahawa Esscom gagal melaksanakan tugasnya. Pengganas Filipina terbabit juga telah menunjukkan bahawa mereka tidak gentar kepada pasukan keselamatan Malaysia.
Insiden jenayah yang berlaku begitu dekat dengan pengkalan Esscom telah menghancurkan ilusi keselamatan awam. Dengan kata lain, kegagalan sistem keselamatan ini telah menunjukkan bahawa tidak ada kawasan yang selamat daripada serangan pengganas Filipina ini.
Usaha lemah Menteri Pertahanan Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein untuk mengalihkan kemarahan Taiwan dan mengelak daripada dipersalahkan dengan mengatakan bahawa insiden ini boleh berlaku di mana-mana adalah bukan sahaja tidak sensitif malah tidak bertanggungjawab serta tidak langsung meredakan ketakutan sama ada kepada mangsa mahupun ahli keluarga mereka. Apa juga usaha yang dilakukan kerajaan BN untuk mengawal keadaan tidak dapat menyembunyikan hakikat bahawa kawalan keselamatan di kawasan Esscom telah gagal.
Cabarannya sekarang ialah untuk menentukan apa langkah yang wajar diambil bagi menimbulkan rasa gerun di kalangan penjenayah yang cuba mengganas di kawasan terbabit dan memastikan kejadian tidak berperikemanusiaan yang sama tidak berulang terhadap rakyat Malaysia mahupun pelancong yang tidak bersalah. Malangnya pihak berkuasa langsung tidak menyebut atau melakukan apa-apa yang memberi keyakinan bahawa pengganas ini akan dihukum dan mangsa akan diselamatkan mahupun jaminan bahawa kegagalan sistem keselamatan tidak akan berulang lagi.
Jika kerajaan Malaysia tidak dapat menyedia dan menjaga keselamatan negara, mungkin mereka patut mendapatkan bantuan daripada badan antarabangsa seperti Pertubuhan Bangsa-bangsa Bersatu. Saya pasti pihak PBB akan memberi respon baik kepada permintaan sedemikian memandangkan Malaysia telah banyak menyumbang kepada pasukan-pasukan pengaman PBB di seluruh dunia.
LIM GUAN ENG
—- Mandarin —
Bagi yang sering mengikuti perkembangan Fasha Sandha di laman Instagram, pasti anda dapat melihat hubungan akrab antara anak Fasha dan Nora Danish. Malah, Rayqal atau nama sebenarnya Putra Rayqal Ramli sering sahaja menemani Rayfal dan […]
15 November, 2013
YB Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein
Pemangku Menteri Pengangkutan
Kementerian Pengangkutan Malaysia
Blok D5, Kompleks D
Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan
YB Datuk Seri,
MENGHALANG PENANG PORT SDN. BHD. (PPSB) MENGURANGKAN PERKHIDMATAN FERI DI PULAU PINANG DAN MEMULAKAN PROJEK PENGOREKAN DASAR LAUT BERNILAI RM353 JUTA DENGAN SEGERA DEMI MENGELAKKAN PPSB KEHILANGAN SASARAN KEUNTUNGAN SEBANYAK RM100 JUTA PADA TAHUN 2015
Dengan hormatnya saya ingin menarik perhatian YB Datuk Seri berhubung permasalahan serius ini yang dilaporkan oleh akhbar-akhbar tempatan pada 7 November 2013 yang lalu.
2. Memetik kenyataan yang dibuat oleh Pengarah Urusan PPSB, YBhg. Datuk Ahmad Ibnihajar kepada para pemberita pada 6 November 2013 di sebuah majlis rasmi PPSB, adanya rancangan PPSB untuk mengurangkan perkhidmatan feri di Pulau Pinang sebaik sahaja Jambatan Kedua Pulau Pinang beroperasi. Ini berikutan PPSB dijangka bakal kehilangan sasaran keuntungan sebanyak RM100 juta pada tahun 2015.
3. YBhg. Datuk Ahmad Ibnihajar juga menjelaskan bahawa kehilangan tersebut berpunca daripada kelewatan usaha untuk menswastakan PPSB yang menyebabkan beberapa projek utama terpaksa ditangguhkan sementara waktu termasuk kelewatan menjalankan projek pengorekan dasar laut yang bernilai RM353 juta yang menyebabkan kehilangan kontrak dengan Belgian Lhoist Group bernilai RM60 juta.
4. Dalam pada itu, penswastaan PPSB ini telah diumumkan oleh Kerajaan Persekutuan pada tahun 2010 di mana YBhg. Tan Sri Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhari yang juga pemilik Pelabuhan Tanjung Pelepas dan Pelabuhan Johor telah memenangi pembidaan tersebut. Kegagalan menjalani projek pengorekan dasar laut dan pengurusan Pelabuhan Pulau Pinang yang semakin hilang arah-tuju tentang masa depan, menyebabkan PPSB sebenarnya mengalami kerugian. Ianya dapat dilihat kepada petunjuk di mana kredit cukai sebanyak RM32.2 juta diberi kepada PPSB. Inilah yang membolehkan PPSB mencatat keuntungan RM16.3 juta. Sekiranya tanpa cukai kredit tersebut, PPSB sebenarnya mengalami kerugian sebanyak RM15.9 juta pada tahun 2012.
5. Kerugian yang dialami oleh PPSB terkini serta kemungkinan kehilangan keuntungan sebanyak RM100 juta telah membuatkan PPSB bercadang untuk mengurangkan perkhidmatan feri di negeri ini sebaik sahaja Jambatan Kedua Pulau Pinang beroperasi. Kerajaan Negeri membantah sepenuhnya pengurangan perkhidmatan feri kerana ianya akan mengakibatkan kesesakan lalu lintas apabila semua kenderaan tertumpu ke Jambatan Pulau Pinang atau Jambatan Kedua Pulau Pinang. Tambahan lagi, adanya pengguna lebih gemar menggunakan feri sebagai mod pengangkutan dari Pulau ke Seberang Jaya kerana faktor jarak, maka pengurangan perkhidmatan feri akan menyebabkan berlakunya kesesakan di kedua-dua jeti berikutan kekerapan feri beroperasi telah dikurangkan.
6. Sehubungan itu, kerjasama YB Datuk Seri adalah diharapkan agar dapat memberikan perhatian serius terhadap perkara ini dan diharapkan dapat memaklumkan status penswastaan PPSB kepada saya dengan secepat yang mungkin. Segala perhatian dan jasa baik YB Datuk Seri amatlah dihargai.
Sekian, terima kasih.
(LIM GUAN ENG)
Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang
—-Mandarin Version —
3．拿督阿末依尼哈加也说，上述损失的原因是因为槟城港口私营化进度缓慢，导致几项主要工程被拖延，包括价值3亿5300万令吉的海港加深工程，并导致当局损失一分与比利时Belgian Lhoist Group 6000万令吉的合约。
4. 联邦政府已经 在2010年宣布槟城港口的私营化计划，丹斯里赛莫达已经赢得竞标，他也拥有柔佛丹绒柏勒巴斯码头及柔佛港口。当局没有加深港口，槟城港口也不确定其未来的发展方向，导致港口事实上面对亏损。这从槟城港口获得豁免税务3220万令吉可以看出。这让港口取得1630万令吉的盈利。如果把税务计算进去，事实上，槟城港口在2012年亏损1590万令吉。
5. 由于槟城港口面对亏损，并可能损失1亿令吉，导致他们建议在槟城第二大桥通车后减少渡轮服务。州政府反对减少渡轮服务，因为这将导致交通阻塞，到时全部车辆将会涌到槟城大桥或槟城第二大桥。 再说，一些使用者更加喜欢使用渡轮往返槟岛与威省以缩短距离，因此，若减少渡轮班次，将导致两个码头的交通阻塞。
Coming from an iPhone4 running iOS6 (Jailbroken), iOS7 is a big leap forward for me. There are quite a number of features now which makes the need to Jailbreak much less. Here are some things which I find cool:
1) Better multi-tasking. I like the running multi-tasking screen which is so much like webOS “cards” and you can call this up with a double tap of the Home button (or the virtual Floating home button if you have set this up in Settings > General > Accessibility > Assistive Touch)
Like webOS the cool thing is you can swipe up to close a “card” and with two fingers you can close more than one card at once.
2) Siri works, seriously. I think many are under-utilizing Siri which can do nifty things like hands-free checking and replying or sending text messages, checking email etc. I am a heavy Rememberthemilk.com and I like the way you can use Siri to set your reminders.
3) The ability to block calls.This one I really like as I was missing the functionality of iBlacklist which requires a Jailbroken device. Now with the combination of iOS’ “Do not disturb” function and the ability to block individual callers, I am a happy camper.
4) More swiping goodness. It could be better but at least now in certain apps swiping can take you back or perform some functions e.g. trash an email.
For a productivity geek, iOS7 is a blessing.
from the Palmdoc Chronicles
Things I like about #iOS7
Jika diperhatikan sekarang ini, semakin banyak berita mengenai penderaan bayi dilakukan oleh kaum keluarga dan pengasuh kanak-kanak didedahkan kepada umum. Berita ini sememangnya merisaukan Anita Baharom yang mempunyai dua orang anak kecil berusia enam dan […]
Penyebaran berita kematian yang tidak benar menerusi laman Twitter bukanlah satu perkara baru buat pengguna laman sosial pada masa kini. Jika sebelum ini pengacara Melodi, Awal Ashaari pernah melahirkan rasa terkejut apabila menerima berita kematiannya […]
Kali Linux (or Kali) is a penetration testing distro created by the developers of BackTrack. Although it is a pentest distro, but Kali does not include with Nessus. So to use Nessus, I have to install it manually.
For more info about Kali, you can refer to their website here: http://www.kali.org/
1. Download Nessus – Go to Tenable website and download Nessus software. Choose Linux, Debian 32-bit or Debian 64-bit.
2. Install Nessus – Once the download is finished, run this command to install Nessus. I’m using 64-bit so my installation file is Nessus-x.x.x-debian6_amd64.deb, where ‘x’ is the version number.
dpkg -i Nessus-x.x.X-debian6_amd64.deb
3. Run Nessus service – Next, I run Nessus service by typing this command in the Terminal.
4. Navigate to Nessus page – Open Iceweasel (Kali’s default web browser) and go to this address, https://kali:8834. Must use HTTPS connection.
5. Initial Account Setup – Next, I create an admin user for Nessus. This user will have full control on Nessus.
6. Register plugin feed – I need to get the Activation Code. To get the code, I can request it from here, Obtain an Activation Code. I choose “Nessus Home” option because I will use Nessus play around with Metasploitable 2.
The Activation Code will be send to my email. I just copy and paste the Activation Code into the field above.
7. Download the newest plugins – At this point, Nessus will start download the latest plugins from Tenable server. It will take a while. So be patient.
8. Login into Nessus – Now, I can login into my Nessus by using the username and password that use during the registration process.
9. Done! – That’s it! Now I can use Nessus to conduct vulnerability scan to the Metasploitable box.
If you stuck with errors, Kali has a community forum that you can ask and request for helps. Feel free to drop by and say hi at the forum.
Siapa makan cili, dia rasa pedas. Itulah perumpamaan yang boleh diberikan tatkala mendengar lagu ini. Apa yang pasti, lagu tersebut kini menjadi siulan peminat dan pernah menimbulkan spekulasi apabila sesetengah pihak mendakwa lagu ini mempunyai unsur […]
The post Altimet & Awi Rafael Lancar MV Terbaru, Kalau Aku Kaya appeared first on Portal Hiburan OHBULAN!.
Umum tahu bahawa isu skandal yang melanda pelakon pujaan ramai, Adi Putra masih belum menemui jalan penyelesaiannya. Sejak kontroversi ini diperkatakan kira-kira dua bulan lepas, ramai peminat dan media yang tertanya-tanya tentang status sebenar kes […]
George Washington, our first president, and Abraham Lincoln, our 16th, are the twin icons of that office. Their portraits are side by side in our wallets, in our change purses and on classroom walls during Presidents’ Day observances. Yet they represent different visions of an American economic order, differences that persist to this day. Washington stood for a system in which one man enriches himself by skimming off the excess value of his underlings’ work. Lincoln stood for the principle that every worker is entitled to the full value of his own labor. Call it the battle between Washingtonomics and Lincolnomics. From the founding of this country up until the Civil War, Washington’s order was dominant. It’s been dominant in our era, too, ever since Washington’s native South regained control of the federal government in the 1970s.
If you want to understand why the United States has never achieved the same level of economic equality as other industrialized nations, you have to look back at Washington’s life and career. And then you have to look back even further, to Washington’s ancestors, who settled Virginia. You’ll find that inequality was one of this nation’s founding principles.
In his socio-historical study “Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America,” David Hackett Fischer argued that American slavery did not result in a stratified society, but was established in order to create one. The early Virginia settlers were the second and third sons of aristocratic families in the south and west of England, and they intended to enjoy in the New World the lifestyle that primogeniture had denied them on their fathers’ manors in the Old. At first, they tried to enslave the Natives. When that failed, they imported Africans.
“Virginia’s ruling elite … required an underclass that would remain firmly fixed in its condition of subordination,” Fischer wrote. “The culture of the English countryside could not be reproduced in the New World without this rural proletariat.”
From its origins in America’s first colony, this aristocratic system spread throughout the entire South. Its success could be found “in the small and very powerful class of landed gentry, in the large majority of landless tenants and laborers, in the minority status of its middle class, in the general level of wealth inequality (Gini ratios of .60 to .75), in the magnitude of poverty and in the degradation of the poor.”
As a result of the Virginians’ social engineering, the United States became a colonial nation in which a European elite has traditionally dominated a combination of indigenous people and descendants of Africans imported to work as slaves. We’re a first-world country and a third-world country, coexisting within the same borders.
In Denmark — the quintessential European social democracy, whose 5 million ethnically homogenous citizens consider themselves members of a single tribe — the Gini ratio is 24. (TheGini ratio is a measurement of a nation’s wealth distribution, with 0 being perfect equality and 100 being all the money in one man’s hands.) The U.S.’s Gini ratio is 45, putting us in the same league as Mexico (48.3), Venezuela (44.8), and Jamaica (45.5) — other colonial nations where white settlers and planters have lorded it over a darker-skinned workforce.
No one benefited from the top-heavy economic structure of colonial Virginia more than George Washington. Washington was a country squire who rode to hounds, danced at cotillions and ordered china and fashionable breeches from London. By the end of his life, he was master of 277 slaves, on whose backs he built the fortune that enabled him to serve as commander in chief of the Continental Army, and then president. Washington was one of the wealthiest men in the United States, and is still the wealthiest man ever to hold the presidency.
Washington envisioned an end to slavery, and an industrial future for America, but a man with his feudal, agrarian outlook would never have prospered in such a nation.
Abraham Lincoln’s entire life was shaped by disagreements with the Southern planter class, to which Washington and most of our early presidents belonged. When Lincoln was 7 years old, his family moved from Kentucky to Indiana to escape the fate of the small farmer squeezed between planter and slave. Lincoln’s father eventually settled on a 120-acre farm near Charleston, Ill., where he raised corn and chickens. Despite his popular image as the Railsplitter, Lincoln hated the rustic life, and moved to Springfield, where he became a respectable, but not wealthy, lawyer. His two-story house on Eighth Street would not look out of place in a modern suburb.
In Lincoln’s home territory of Central Illinois, many voters hated slavery and African-Americans for the same reason: because both plantation owners and free African-Americans undercut the price of white labor. Lincoln belonged to a middle class of independent professionals and tradesmen that was growing in the North, but was incompatible with the plantation society in the South, and he knew how to appeal to its anxieties.
During his campaigns for the Senate and the presidency, Lincoln argued that African-Americans deserved economic, but not social, equality. In his debates with Sen. Stephen A. Douglas, Lincoln declared that he did not believe African-Americans should be allowed to vote, or serve on juries, or hold office, or marry whites. He did believe that African-Americans had as much right to the fruits of their own labor as whites, that slavery was “a form of theft,” and that a society divided into permanent classes of masters and servants was doomed to medieval stagnation, because workers would have no motivation to better themselves. At the bottom of Lincoln’s moralizing was this message to white voters: If the black man can be made to work for nothing, so can you.
In an 1859 speech to the Wisconsin State Agricultural Society, Lincoln went beyond condemning masters’ exploitation of their slaves, and criticized the very concept of purchasing another’s labor. To Lincoln, the idea that one man should be in the permanent employ of another — even for wages — was at the root of the justification for slavery. He said:
By some it is assumed that labor is available only in connection with capital–that nobody labors, unless somebody else owning capital, somehow, by the use of it, induces him to do it. Having assumed this, they proceed to consider whether it is best that capital shall hire laborers, and thus induce them to work by their own consent, or buy them, and drive them to it, without their consent. Having proceeded so far, they naturally conclude that all laborers are necessarily either hired laborers, or slaves.
They further assume that whoever is once a hired laborer, is fatally fixed in that condition for life; and thence again, that his condition is as bad as, or worse, than that of a slave. This is the ‘mud-sill’ theory. But another class of reasoners hold the opinion that there is no such relation between capital and labor, as assumed; and that there is no such thing as a freeman being fatally fixed for life, on the condition of a hired laborer, that both these assumptions are false, and all inferences from them groundless. They hold that labor is prior to, and independent of, capital; that, in fact, capital is the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed–that labor can exist without capital, but that capital could never have existed without labor. Hence they hold that labor is the superior–greatly the superior of capital.
As president, Lincoln oversaw a war that destroyed the power of the Southern plantation owners with whom he had so long quarreled. His victory lasted just over 100 years, until the Southern states regained control of the federal government, and began reimposing Washington’s aristocratic way of life on the nation. To understand the difference between Lincolnomics and Washingtonomics, let’s consider two of the most successful businessmen of the 20th century: Henry Ford and Sam Walton. Ford falls into the Lincolnian tradition, Walton into the Washingtonian.
Born in what is now Detroit during the Civil War, Ford understood the value of an economically empowered workforce. He turned traditional economic assumptions upside down by treating laborers not as commodities, but potential customers. Before Ford, planters and industrialists had profited by paying the lowest possible wages and charging the highest possible prices. Ford doubled his employees’ wages, to $5 a day, and used assembly-line efficiencies to produce cars they could afford to buy. His philosophy, which came to be known as Fordism, was fundamental to the development of the modern middle class. And although Ford resisted labor unions, once the United Auto Workers was forced on him by two Lincolnian politicians — President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Michigan Gov. Murray Van Wagoner — he granted it the most generous contract of any automaker, even allowing dues check-offs and the closed shop.
Sam Walton built his business on a plantation model with which Washington would have been familiar. The merchant opened his first Wal-Marts in Arkansas, Oklahoma and Missouri, paying wages that were low even for a region accustomed to extremes of wealth. He started his cashiers at 50 cents an hour — half the minimum wage — on the grounds that the law applied only to businesses with 50 employees or more, and each of his stores was more lightly staffed than that. Wal-Mart cashiers got raises only when the Labor Department stepped in. Like Washington’s tobacco plantation, Walton’s stores were labor-intensive operations that could only turn a profit if workers were bargained down to the lowest possible nickel. Walton’s product was low prices, which were possible only if his workers earned low wages. Undistracted by war or politics, Walton did Washington better, becoming the wealthiest man in America, with a fortune of $20 billion — the surplus he skimmed off the labor of 1.1 million employees. Wal-Mart also became the largest employer in the U.S., displacing General Motors, which practiced Fordism on an even larger scale than Ford.
“It is doubtful Wal-Mart would have met similar success in an earlier period of American economic history, or in a different social and political environment,” wrote Jeff Madrick in “Age of Greed: The Triumph of Finance and the Decline of America, 1970 to the Present.” “Labor laws were increasingly poorly enforced in this era, starting with the Reagan administration. The number of government labor inspectors was not increased even as the nation’s workforce grew vastly in number … Across the nation, a rapidly growing number of workers were illegally fired when they tried to organize fellow workers into unions. Congress also deliberately kept the minimum wage down, raising it rarely, so it fell compared to inflation.”
Actually, the economic deregulation that would help make Sam Walton a multibillionaire began one president earlier, under Jimmy Carter. Carter, the son of a moderately prosperous peanut farmer whose land was worked by sharecroppers, was the first Southerner to win the presidency in his own right since Zachary Taylor. His election began a three-decade period during which every president either hailed from a Southern state or, in Ronald Reagan’s case, was elected with strong Southern support. George Washington’s region had returned to power, and that return brought political support for the stratified society that has existed in the South since the Father of Our Country’s day. As Michael Lind wrote here on Salon, “for generations Southern economic policymakers have sought to secure a lucrative second-tier role for the South in the national and world economies, as a supplier of commodities like cotton and oil and gas and a source of cheap labor for footloose corporations. This strategy of specializing in commodities and cheap labor is intended to enrich the Southern oligarchy. It doesn’t enrich the majority of Southerners, white, black or brown, but it is not intended to. Contrary to what is often said, the ‘original sin’ of the South is not slavery, or even racism. It is cheap, powerless labor.”
For a long time, that was a regional economic strategy, but once the South recaptured the federal government, it attempted to spread that ethos throughout the entire nation — with great success, as evidenced by today’s weak labor laws and lagging minimum wages. Wal-Mart could not have broken out of its cradle in Dixie and become the nation’s dominant retailer without those policies. Even Indiana and Michigan, once-reliable redoubts of free labor, recently became right-to-work states, putting themselves on the same page as every member of the old Confederacy.
The core principle of Lincoln’s political career (as opposed to his presidency) was preventing the spread of slavery into the territories and the Northern states, where it would undermine free labor. If we accept Lind’s argument about low-wage economic policies, we should be as determined as Lincoln to confine them to their native region. Or better yet, stamp them out altogether, as we did slavery. Because they are threatening the existence of a middle class.
The time may be right, too. Barack Obama is the first president elected from a Northern, industrial state since John F. Kennedy. From Lincoln’s own Illinois, in fact. Much has been made of that fact that Obama fulfilled the advances in racial equality that Lincoln began. But Lincoln didn’t free the slaves with the idea that one of them would become president. He gave them their freedom to prevent their unpaid labor from undercutting the middle class. That’s another aspect of Lincoln’s legacy Obama can fulfill.
Bagi anda yang mengikuti perkembangan Akademi Fantasia, pelajar kelahiran Sabah, Faizul Sany atau nama sebenarnya Mohd Faizul Bin Sany baru saja dinobatkan sebagai juara Akademi Fantasia 2013 mengatasi 12 peserta yang lain. Mempertaruhkan genre pop indie, penyanyi […]
The post Monday Music : Sepasang Sayap Bawa Faizul Jadi Juara AF2013 appeared first on Portal Hiburan OHBULAN!.
Anwar Ibrahim has lashed out at the government for failing to hold Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail accountable over the loss of Batu Puteh in a territorial dispute at the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
During the budget debate at the committee stage in Parliament today, the opposition leader said he was puzzled that the government did not even seek clarification over the defeat in the high stakes case.
“We lost an island but the attorney-general was never questioned. It was as if there was already an understanding (between the attorney-general and government) or were they both afraid of something, I do not understand.
“Why were they afraid to ask questions so that a proper explanation could be given by the attorney-general?” he asked.
Abdul Gani had led the case for Malaysia at the ICJ in 2008.
It was reported on Nov 7 that former Kuala Lumpur CID chief Mat Zain Ibrahim had made a statutory declaration claiming that the Malaysian team had submitted fabricated evidence to the ICJ in the Batu Puteh case.
According to him, this was discovered by the ICJ which damaged Malaysia’s credibility and contributed to the country’s defeat in the dispute.
Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim accused Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak of “not being brave” enough to reprimand the United States after whistleblower Edward Snowden exposed a global espionage network by the US and Australia that affected Malaysia as well.
He said unlike other countries which had taken drastic action to protest against the alleged spying, Malaysia has been slow to react, sending only a protest note from the Foreign Ministry.
“To date, there is no statement from the prime minister. He is not brave to reprimand the rudeness and unacceptable conduct of the United States,” he said when debating the Budget 2014 which is currently at the committee stage.
Snowden had alleged that the US was running a monitoring station in its Kuala Lumpur embassy to tap telephones and monitor communication networks.
Last month, Australian intelligence sources confirmed that XKeyscore, a top secret intelligence tool revealed by Snowden, had been used to spy on Malaysia and other Asia-Pacific countries.
The latest report on top secret documents leaked by Snowden, who currently has been granted by Russia, revealed that there are 90 electronic surveillance facilities worldwide, including in the US embassies in Jakarta, Bangkok, Phnom Penh and Yangon.
Following the revelations, Foreign Affairs Minister Datuk Seri Anifah Aman told Australian counterpart Julie Bishop that spying should not take place among “close friends as it could severely damage existing relations”.
Anwar also raised his concerns over the recent revelation by former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad over the presence of CIA agents in the Attorney General’s Chambers.
“I don’t understand why no one, especially Umno MPs, raised this matter. Since Dr Mahathir had spoken about this, there should be a clear explanation, if they are not CIA agents, then what are they doing in the AG’s Chambers,” he said.
He then trained his guns on the Attorney General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail, saying that the country lost its case on Pulau Batu Puteh in the International Court of Justice because Gani prepared a photo which showed a wrong location of the island.
The International Court of Justice awarded the island off Johor to Singapore after a legal dispute in 2008.
“He was never questioned about this. I don’t understand, either there seemed to be an understanding or they are afraid to ask him to explain,” Anwar said, adding that the public was entitled to an explanation from Gani on the allegations surrounding him and his office.
Earlier this month, Anwar had said Gani should be suspended immediately in the wake of the allegations which were contained in a statutory declaration by former Kuala Lumpur CID chief Datuk Mat Zain Ibrahim.
It was reported that three months ago, Dr Mahathir, Mat Zain, prominent lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah and Federal Commercial Crimes Investigation Department director Datuk Ramli Yusoff held a meeting at the former prime minister’s residence to discuss Gani’s alleged misdeeds.
The meeting was held on August 10, three days after Hari Raya Aidilfitri, and among the topics discussed was the highly publicised case of Pulau Batu Puteh.
It is true that you might be eligible to install a solar panel on your roof, get electricity power generated, then sell it back to TNB at a price that’s higher than you purchase. Therefore, making monthly passive income. How does this work? Watch the video explanation by expert William Lean below:
First, a little bit of history: The parliament of Malaysia created a renewable energy act two years ago. They created the Renewable Energy Fund (RE Fund). The Renewable Energy Fund is basically a tax for everyone who uses more than RM77 a month of electricity.
The tax has taken about 1% from you since December 2011. This 1% will go to Renewable Energy Fund which has about RM300 million per annum and is administered by Tenaga National. Notice, though, the word used is “administered” not “paid.” The money will be paid by the RE fund.
Before we can get in to all the goodies, we first have to apply for a quota. They call it the Feed-in Tariff Quota from SEDA (Sustainable Energy Development Authority), which is a department of the Ministry of Energy. So, we are dealing with government companies here. So, what I hope to do is teach you how to maneuver through the system and get back some of the money which you have put aside for renewable energy.
I mentioned earlier that there is a quota on how much Tenaga can pay out since we’re taxed by about RM300 million per annum. So, everybody has got to apply for the quota from the SEDA. The application is done through the Internet. The application is on a first-come, first-served basis for the Individual Sector which is who we are.
The individuals who have their own roof top at the top of their house. For 2013, they kept it at 20 mW. What is 20 mW? It is the equivalent of 1700 houses of 12 kW. If you go for a size of 4 kW, then we are talking about 3,000-4,000 houses.
But, you might be getting confused. You might be thinking what is Kilowatt? Kilowatt is a measure of the capacity of the solar panel. It’s a bit like a car engine – a car can be 1.5c or a 2.0cc. So, it’s a bit like power plants. What is the kilowatt of your solar power system? Is it a 4 kW? A 4 kW is typical for a linked house. A 6 kW to 8 kW is typical for a semi-detached. A bungalow can fit a 12 kW. This is just a guide to give you a sense of the range.
All Malaysian IC holders can apply for up to 2 x 12 kW. Since you’re coming to the second half of the year, there’s only a quota of about 1.8 mW left, enough for 200 to 400 houses.
A 12 kW system roughly requires 1000 sqft of roof space. So, a lot of you would say, “Hey, I don’t know how big my roof is.” Well, to be fair, most developers do not give, what we call, a roof plan. Ideally, we need to look at the roof plan, so we can calculate how many solar panels you can fit on the roof. But, no worries – if you don’t have the roof plan, one of the installers can come over and provide you a quotation anyway.
For Premium Webinar Members (PWM), you can watch the full session here:
Penyanyi yang popular menerusi lagu Harus Terpisah, Cakra Khan, dijadualkan bakal hadir ke Malaysia pada minggu depan bagi mempromosikan album terbarunya dan sekaligus mengadakan showcase buat para peminatnya di Hard Rock Cafe, Kuala Lumpur. Menurut Cakra […]
Susulan babak ranjang yang dilakonkan oleh pelakon otai, Wan Hanafi Su dan Marsha Milan Londoh menerusi filem terbaru mereka, Laga, akters berketurunan Kadazan-Dusun itu menjelaskan bahawa dia puas kerana dapat merealisasikan watak tersebut dengan baik seperti mana […]
The post Marsha Jawab Isu Babak Ranjang Bersama Wan Hanafi Su appeared first on Portal Hiburan OHBULAN!.
Najib perlu memberi kenyataan kementerian di Parlimen pada hari Isnin ini tentang kelonggaran kawalan keselamatan Esscom sehingga menyebabkan seorang pelancong dari Taiwan ditembak mati dan isterinya diculik oleh kumpulan yang disyaki sebagai pengganas Abu Sayyaf di pulau Pom Pom berhampiran Semporna
Pihak berkuasa berkenaan di JB tidak sepatutnya berdiam diri tetapi sebaliknya perlu memanfaatkan kontroversi mural “jenayah Tinggi Zachas untuk melancarkan inisiatif baru bagi menghapuskan reputasi JB sebagai pusat jenayah negara
Mural “jenayah tinggi” Zachas patut dikekalkan sebagai cabaran untuk pihak berkuasa menjadikan JB bandar rendah jenayah dan sebagai testimoni bahawa kadar jenayah yang tinggi di JB “hanya tinggal dalam lipatan sejarah”
Breakfast Like A Maharaja | Refurbished Old Fort & Palace | #Khaplu Palace & Residences by #Serena Hotel | Summer 2012 | Road Less Travelled | Khaplu Valley | #Gangche District | Gilgit-#Baltistan Region | Northern #Pakistan
Malaysia’s Failure To Protect Malaysians, Ensure Security And Stop Illegal Filipino Immigrants From Freely Entering Sabah To Threaten Malaysians Highlighted Only When A Foreign Tourist Is Killed And Another Kidnapped. (en/bm/cn)